unicorn/prefer-includes Style
What it does
Prefer includes() over indexOf() when checking for existence or non-existence. All built-ins have .includes() in addition to .indexOf().
Why is this bad?
The .includes() method is more readable and less error-prone than .indexOf().
Examples
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
javascript
if (str.indexOf("foo") !== -1) {}Examples of correct code for this rule:
javascript
if (str.includes("foo")) {}How to use
To enable this rule in the CLI or using the config file, you can use:
bash
oxlint --deny unicorn/prefer-includesjson
{
"rules": {
"unicorn/prefer-includes": "error"
}
}